<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lepping, Peter</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Should we widen our restraint choices?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%"> Social Work and Social Sciences Review</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2025</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2025</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://journals.whitingbirch.net/index.php/SWSSR/article/view/2504</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">25</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&lt;meta charset=&quot;UTF-8&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fysiske tvangmidler brukes på rundt 5 % av psykiatriske pasienter i Storbritannia. Pasientene opplever ulike typer fiksering på svært forskjellige måter. Denne artikkelen hevder at Storbritannia begrenser sine tjenester og psykiatriske pasienter fra å ta egne valg om hvilke typer fiksering som skal brukes, ved å begrense tilgjengelig fiksering til isolasjon og fysisk fiksering.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Festschrift for Peter Huxley</style></work-type></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tonje Lossius Husum</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Irene Wormdahl</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Solveig H. H. Kjus</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Trond Hatling</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jorun Rugkåsa</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Something Happened with the Way We Work: Evaluating the Implementation of the Reducing Coercion in Norway (ReCoN) Intervention in Primary Mental Health Care</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MDPI</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">co-creation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">complex intervention</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Deltakende forskning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">implementation research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Implementeringsforskning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Involuntary admission</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kompleks intervensjon</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mental health services</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">participatory research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Primary mental health care</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Primær psykisk helseomsorg</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">process evaluation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Prosessevaluering</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">psykiske helsetjenester</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">reducing coercion</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Redusere tvang</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Samskaping</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ufrivillig innleggelse</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2024</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2024</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/12/7/786</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Background: Current policies to reduce the use of involuntary admissions are largely oriented towards specialist mental health care and have had limited success. We co-created, with stakeholders in five Norwegian municipalities, the &amp;lsquo;Reducing Coercion in Norway&amp;rsquo; (ReCoN) intervention that aims to reduce involuntary admissions by improving the way in which primary mental health services work and collaborate. The intervention was implemented in five municipalities and is being tested in a cluster randomized control trial, which is yet to be published. The present study evaluates the implementation process in the five intervention municipalities. To assess how the intervention was executed, we report on how its different elements were implemented, and what helped or hindered implementation. Methods: We assessed the process using qualitative methods. Data included detailed notes from quarterly progress interviews with (i) intervention coordinators and representatives from (ii) user organisations and (iii) carer organisations. Finally, an end-of-intervention evaluation seminar included participants from across the sites. Results: The majority of intervention actions were implemented. We believe this was enabled by the co-creating process, which ensured ownership and a good fit for the local setting. The analysis of facilitators and barriers showed a high degree of interconnectedness between different parts of the intervention so that success (or lack thereof) in one area affected the success in others. Future implementation should pay attention to enhanced planning and training, clarify the role and contribution of service user and carer involvement, and pay close attention to the need for implementation support and whether this should be external or internal to services. Conclusions: It is feasible to implement a complex intervention designed to reduce the use of involuntary admissions in general support services, such as the Norwegian primary mental health services. This could have implications for national and international policy aimed at reducing the use of involuntary care.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Healthcare 2024</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Johanne Skumsnes</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Samtykke som grunnlag for behandling i psykisk helsevern. I lys av samfunnsdebatten etter lovendringen i 2017</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Samtykke som grunnlag for behandling i psykisk helsevern. I lys av samfunnsdebatten etter lovendringen i 2017</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2023</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2023</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://munin.uit.no/handle/10037/32095</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Den rettslige problemstillingen har blitt aktualisert av både faglig debatt og samfunnsdebatt etter lovendringen i 2017. Det har blant annet dukket opp kritikk fra medisinsk hold om at loven ikke fungerer etter hensikten, og det er vist til konkrete saker der personer har blitt vurdert til å være samtykkekompetent med alvorlige konsekvenser. Oppgaven forsøker å belyse hvorvidt lovendringen har medført at færre pasienter med psykiske lidelser får den behandlingen de trenger.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master Thesis</style></work-type></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Johanne Skumsnes</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Samtykke som grunnlag for behandling i psykisk helsevern. I lys av samfunnsdebatten etter lovendringen i 2017</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Samtykke som grunnlag for behandling i psykisk helsevern. I lys av samfunnsdebatten etter lovendringen i 2017</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2023</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2023</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://munin.uit.no/handle/10037/32095</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Den rettslige problemstillingen har blitt aktualisert av både faglig debatt og samfunnsdebatt etter lovendringen i 2017. Det har blant annet dukket opp kritikk fra medisinsk hold om at loven ikke fungerer etter hensikten, og det er vist til konkrete saker der personer har blitt vurdert til å være samtykkekompetent med alvorlige konsekvenser. Oppgaven forsøker å belyse hvorvidt lovendringen har medført at færre pasienter med psykiske lidelser får den behandlingen de trenger.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master Thesis</style></work-type></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Husum, T. L.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Siqveland, J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ruud, T., &amp; Lickiewicz</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Systematic literature review of the use of Staff Attitudes to Coercion Scale (SACS)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Frontiers in Psychiatry</style></secondary-title><short-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Systematic literature review of the use of Staff Attitudes to Coercion Scale (SACS)</style></short-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">assessment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">attitudes</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Coercion</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mental Health</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">staff</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2023</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;Staff&amp;#39;s attitudes to the use of coercion may influence the number of coercive interventions employed and staff willingness to engage in professional development projects aimed at reducing the use of coercion itself. The Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS) was developed to assess the attitudes of mental healthcare staff to the use of coercion in 2008 and has been employed subsequently. This global study systematically reviews and summarizes the use of the scale in research.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;Seven databases were searched for studies using SACS in articles published in peer reviewed journals and gray literature. In addition, researchers who have asked for permission to use the scale since its development in 2008 were contacted and asked for their possible results. Extracting of data from the papers were performed in pairs of the authors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;Of the 82 identified publications, 26 papers with 5,838 respondents were selected for review. A review of the research questions used in the studies showed that the SACS questionnaire was mostly used in studies of interventions aimed at reducing coercion and further explain variation in the use of coercion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;SACS is, to our best of knowledge, the only questionnaire measuring staff&amp;#39;s attitudes to the use of coercive interventions in mental health services. Its widespread use indicates that the questionnaire is perceived as feasible and useful as well as demonstrating the need for such a tool. However, further research is needed as the relationship between staff attitudes to coercion and the actual use of coercion remains unclear and needs to be further investigated. Staff attitudes to coercion may be a prerequisite for leaders and staff in mental healthcare to engage in service development and quality improvement projects.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Engerbakk, Elin</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Samtykkekompetanse i tvungent psykisk helsevern - Har innføringen av kravet til samtykkekompetanse i phvl. § 3-3 virket etter sitt formål?</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Samtykkekompetanse</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvungent psykisk helsevern</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">§3-3</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2021</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/87211/5/548.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">UiO, Det juridiske fakultet</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oslo</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Sammendrag finnes ikke&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master thesis</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tore Hofstad</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jorun Rugkåsa</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Solveig Osborg Ose</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Olav Nyttingnes</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Solveig Helene Høymork Kjus</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tonje Lossius Husum</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Service Characteristics and Geographical Variation in Compulsory Hospitalisation: An exploratory random effects within-between analysis of Norwegian municipalities 2015-2018</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Frontiers in Psychiatry</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Geografisk varasjon</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tjenestetilbud</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12/2021</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.737698/full?</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;Compulsory hospitalisation in mental healthcare is contested. For ethical and legal reasons, it should only be used as a last resort. Geographical variation could indicate that some areas employ compulsory hospitalisation more frequently than is strictly necessary. Explaining variation in compulsory hospitalisation might contribute to reducing overuse, but research on associations with service characteristics remains patchy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;We aimed to investigate the associations between the levels of compulsory hospitalisation and the characteristics of primary mental health services in Norway between 2015 and 2018 and the amount of variance explained by groups of explanatory variables.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;We applied random-effects within&amp;ndash;between Poisson regression of 461 municipalities/city districts, nested within 72 community mental health centre catchment areas (&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;= 1,828 municipality-years).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;More general practitioners, mental health nurses, and the total labour-years in municipal mental health and addiction services per population are associated with lower levels of compulsory hospitalisations within the same areas, as measured by both persons (inpatients) and events (hospitalisations). Areas that, on average, have more general practitioners and public housing per population have lower levels of compulsory hospitalisation, while higher levels of compulsory hospitalisation are seen in areas with a longer history of supported employment and the systematic gathering of service users&amp;#39; experiences. In combination, all the variables, including the control variables, could account for 39&amp;ndash;40% of the variation, with 5&amp;ndash;6% related to municipal health services.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;Strengthening primary mental healthcare by increasing the number of general practitioners and mental health workers can reduce the use of compulsory hospitalisation and improve the quality of health services.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>32</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Holst, Ø</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Samfunnsvernets begrensninger: En kritisk analyse av lovverket for gjennomføring av dom på tvungent psykisk helsevern</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">dom</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Samfunnsvern</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvungent psykisk helsevern</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://hdl.handle.net/1956/24154</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;This thesis is a critical analysis of court-ordered compulsory psychiatric care, with the main emphasis on the regulations related to the implementation of this type of legal response. Court-ordered compulsory psychiatric care is not regarded as punishment, but as a special penal sanction with a specific purpose: to protect society against serious crimes. Nevertheless, it can be argued that criminal law sanctions against criminally insane offenders constitute a violation of the principle that such sanctions should be reserved for those who are responsible and can be blamed for their actions. The treatment of persons with severe mental illness is first and foremost a task for the health services, regardless of whether or not they have committed a crime. In light of this, special penal sanctions have been criticised. For the Norwegian legislator, however, the need to protect society against serious crime has been sufficient to prompt the adoption of court-ordered compulsory psychiatric care. The thesis will critically examine the premise that the special penal sanction is a necessary supplement to civil law in order to safeguard the protection of society. The question is whether the special penal sanction reform (which regulates court-ordered compulsory psychiatric care) has resulted in strengthened crime prevention&amp;mdash;which was both the purpose of the legislation and the justification for court-ordered compulsory psychiatric care. The answer is that there are problems with several aspects of the regulations, which together create strong doubts as to whether the sanction can be justified by the premise of strengthened crime prevention. The thesis will show that already at the legislative stage the sanction was characterised by compromises and an unresolved legislative will, which resulted in internal contradictions and a lack of clarity in the legislation. This in turn appears to increase uncertainty among those who will apply the legislation&amp;mdash;the responsible physician or psychologist in the healthcare system. This thesis is, therefore, a contribution to the discussion on the use of criminal law as a tool outside the criminal law&amp;#39;s core prerogative related to accountability and punishment.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Doctor Thesis</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>36</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hauge, I</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sykepleier-pasient-relasjonens betydning for bruk av tvang hos rettspsykiatriske pasienter</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Brukermedvirkning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rettspsykiatri</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sykepleier-pasient-relasjon</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvang</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Høgskulen på Vestlandet, bachelor i sykepleie</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stord</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Tittel: Sykepleier-pasient-relasjonens betydning for bruk av tvang hos rettspsykiatriske pasienter&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bakgrunn for valg av tema: I det siste tiåret har politikere og helse- og omsorgstjenestene for alvor satt søkelyset på å få redusert bruken av tvang innen psykiatrien. Evidensen for negative aspekter ved tvang er økende, samtidig er det bred enighet nasjonalt og internasjonalt totalforbud ikke er realistisk. Det er derfor hensiktsmessig å undersøke faktorer som kan være behjelpelig i målet om reduksjon av tvang.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Problemstilling: I hvilken grad har relasjonen mellom sykepleier og pasient betydning for om bruk av tvang blir nødvendig hos rettspsykiatriske pasienter?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hensikt: Å undersøke om relasjonen kan være en faktor som avgjør om tvang blir nødvendig, samt relasjonens betydning for utøvelse av forsvarlig, integritetsbevarende og ivaretakende sykepleie under tvang. Metode: En litteraturstudie der relevant og pålitelig forskning og annen faglitteratur benyttes for å svare på problemstillingen.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Resultater/Funn: Sykepleiers holdninger og forvaltning av makt har betydning for om tvang blir nødvendig, samt for hvordan pasienter opplever tvangen når det er nødvendig. Økt brukermedvirkning og fokus på relasjonsarbeid har positiv betydning innen voldsforebygging, bedring av pasientens psykiske helse og reduksjon av tvangsbruk. Etisk refleksjon med pasienten, samt innad i avdelingen har betydning for forebygging av uetisk praksis, samt for pasientens recovery. En god sykepleier-pasient-relasjon og etisk refleksjon med pasienten gir en større innsikt i situasjonene, og bidrar til ansvarliggjøring og selvstendiggjøring.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Konklusjon: Relasjonen mellom sykepleier og pasient viser seg å ha vesentlig betydning for om tvang blir nødvendig, og for pasientenes opplevelse tilknyttet tvangen. Videre bør økt brukermedvirkning og relasjonsarbeid få større plass innen rettspsykiatrien.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Summary&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Title: The nurse-patient-relationship&amp;rsquo;s importance for the use of coercion in forensic psychiatric patients&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Background: In the past decade, politicians and healthcare services have seriously put the spotlight on reducing the use of coercion in psychiatry. Evidence of negative aspects of coercion is increasing, but at the same time there is a broad consensus national and international that a total ban is not realistic. It is therefore appropriate to investigate factors that may be helpful in in the goal of reducing coercion. Research question: To what extent does the relationship between nurse and patient influence whether use of coercion becomes necessary in forensic psychiatric patients?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Aim: To investigate whether the relationship can be a factor that determines whether coercion is necessary, as well as the relationship&amp;rsquo;s importance for providing proper, integritypreserving and caring nursing during coercion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Method: A literature study where relevant reliable and valid studies and other literature is used to answer the research question.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Results/findings: Nurses&amp;rsquo; attitudes and management of power have an impact on whether coercion becomes necessary, as well as how patients experience coercion when needed. Increased user participation and focus on relationships have a positive impact in violence prevention, improving the patient&amp;rsquo;s mental health and reducing the use of coercion. Ethical reflection with the patient, as well as within the department, is important for the prevention of unethical practices, as well as for the patient&amp;rsquo;s recovery. A good nurse-patient relationship and ethical reflection with the patient gives a greater insight into the situations and contributes to accountability and independence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Conclusion: The relationship between nurse and patient proves to be of significant importance for whether coercion becomes necessary and for the patients&amp;rsquo; experience associated with coercion. Furthermore, increased user participation and working with the relationship should be given more attention in forensic psychiatry.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Keywords: Nurse-Patient relation, Forensic psychiatry, coercion, user participation&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bachelor Thesis</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvangsmidler</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>36</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wiersdalen, M A</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sykepleiers holdninger til tvang i psykisk helsevern</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Holdninger</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Psykisk helsevern</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sykepleier</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvang</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsmidler</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Høgskulen på Vestlandet, bachelor i sykepleie</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Tittel:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sykepleiers holdninger til tvang i psykisk helsevern&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bakgrunn for valg av tema:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tvang i psykisk helsevern er et kontroversielt tema. Regjeringen har et mål om å redusere tvangsbruken. Hensikten med denne oppgaven er å få bedre forståelse for sykepleiers rolle vedrørende tvang og i hvilken grad holdninger kan påvirke bruken av tvang.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Problemstilling:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;laquo;Hvordan kan sykepleiers holdninger påvirke bruken av tvang?&amp;raquo;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Metode:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dette er en litteraturstudie hvor eksisterende forskning og faglitteratur er brukt for å svare på en problemstilling.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Funn og konklusjon:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sosialpsykologiske teorier viser at sterke holdninger påvirker handlinger. Forskning viser at sykepleiere anser tvang som nødvendig, men bruk tvang kan samtidig føre til dårlig samvittighet. Sykepleieres holdninger påvirkes av både kollegaer og personalkultur. Erfaring, alder og kjønn kan påvirke holdninger og bruken av tvang. Denne litteraturstudien foreslår videre forskning på temaet, mer undervisning, og at det er blandede kjønn, alder og erfaringsnivå blant personalet på avdelinger. Dette vil kunne ha en innvirkning på sykepleieres holdninger, og bruken av tvang.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Abstract&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Title:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Attitudes of nurses towards the use of coercion within psychiatric health care&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Background:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coercion within psychiatric health care is a controversial topic. The Norwegian government aims to reduce the use of coercion within psychiatric health care services. The intent behind this assignment is to better understand nurses&amp;rsquo; role in coercion, and to what extent attitudes can influence the use of coercion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Research question:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;How can attitudes of nurses influence the use of coercion?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Method:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is a literature review where existing research and literature were used to answer the problem to be addressed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Findings and conclusion:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sociopsychological theories show that strong attitudes influence actions. Studies show nurses&amp;rsquo; view coercion as a necessity, but it may lead to a feeling of guilt. Nurses&amp;rsquo; attitudes are affected by colleagues and staff culture. Experience, age and gender may influence the use of coercion. This literature review suggests further research on the subject as well as more training and mixed personnel at the hospital ward, as these factors may have an impact in nurses&amp;rsquo; attitudes and the use of coercion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Keywords: Attitudes of nurses, coercion, mental health care,&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bachelor Thesis</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvangsmidler</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Simon Hestenes Eika</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Samtykkekompetanse i tvungent psykisk helsevern - hvordan har introduksjonen av nytt vilkår i psykisk helsevernlov § 3-3 påvirket virkeområdet til bestemmelsen?</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Samtykkekompetanse</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">§3-3</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://bora.uib.no/bora-xmlui/bitstream/handle/1956/20115/186_JUS399_V19.pdf?sequence=1&amp;isAllowed=y</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">UiB, juridisk fakultet</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Denne oppgaven vil forsøke å undersøke hva som er virkningene av innføring av nytt vilkår i phvl. &amp;sect; 3-3 (1), nr. 4. Dette vil gjøres ved å først undersøke innholdet i det materielle hovedvilkåret i phvl. &amp;sect; 3-3 (1), nr. 3, som krever at pasienten har en &amp;laquo;alvorlig sinnslidelse&amp;raquo;. Dette har tidligere vært det sentrale materielle vilkår for etablering av tvungent psykisk helsevern etter phvl &amp;sect; 3-3. Videre vil det gjøres rede for innholdet i det nye materielle vilkåret om at &amp;laquo;pasienten mangler samtykkekompetanse&amp;raquo; i phvl. &amp;sect; 3-3 (1), nr. 4. Til slutt vil oppgaven sammenligne virkeområdet til de to vilkårene, for slik å prøve å finne ut hva som vil være virkningen av lovendringen. Tanken er at lovendringens rettslige effekt vil synliggjøres ved å se når virkeområdet til de to vilkårene i phvl. &amp;sect; 3-3 sammenfaller.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mastergradsoppgave</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse, etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Syse, A.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Strafferettslig utilregnelighet – Utilregnelig innhold og nærmest utilregnelig prosess</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alvorlig sinnslidelse</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Straffeloven</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Utilregnelighet</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.tvangsforskning.no/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Strafferettslig-utilregnelighet.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><edition><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></edition><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Institutt for offentlig rett, UiO</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oslo</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Skrevet i vennebok til Ulf Stridbeck 70 år. Utgitt&lt;br /&gt;av Institutt for offentlig rett. Omhandler de nye reglene om strafferettslig&lt;br /&gt;utilregnelighet og strafferettslig særreaksjoner.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Teksten kan lastes ned i sin helhet fra linken under.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;Forfatteren har alle rettigheter til innholdet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nedlasting til personlig bruk er gitt tillatelse til.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bjørn Henning Østenstad</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Caroline Adolphsen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Eva Naur</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Henriette Sinding Aasen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Selvbestemmelse og tvang i helse- og omsorgstjenesten</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Helsehjelp</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Motstand</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Samtykke</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Selvbestemmelse</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvang</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://bibsys-almaprimo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=BIBSYS_ILS71556463300002201&amp;context=U&amp;vid=UBTO&amp;lang=no_NO&amp;search_scope=default_scope</style></url></web-urls></urls><edition><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></edition><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fagbokforlaget</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bergen</style></pub-location><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">302</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">978-82-450-1982-7</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Retten til å bestemme over egen kropp er et grunnleggende utgangspunkt både i nasjonal lovgivning og etter menneskerettighetene. Det gjelder også i møte med helsepersonell som tilbyr helsehjelp av god kvalitet og ut fra de beste formål. Men hvor langt rekker dette synspunktet? Når må det likevel kunne gripes inn og gis hjelp uten samtykke, eventuelt under motstand? I ni artikler drøftes ulike sider ved denne problematikken, som er særlig aktuell overfor enkeltpersoner med psykisk funksjonssvikt. Blant temaene som drøftes, er forholdet til internasjonale menneskerettigheter, forståelsen av ulike tvangsbegreper, forsvarlighet, involvering av pårørende, tvangsmedisinering i psykisk helsevern og rettssikkerhet for barn. Boken er et samarbeid mellom norske og danske rettsforskere, og inneholder både prinsipielle drøftinger og avklaring av mer konkrete problemstillinger.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Memona Rehman</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Should Dignity be Compromised?- Contextualizing the Relation Between Coercive Treatment and Dignity, from the Perspective of Persons with Experience from Norwegian Mental Health Care Facilities.</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">coercive treatment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dignity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">human rights</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Universitetet i Sør-Norge</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kongsberg</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Research reveals that there is a lack of studies done from the perspective of people with experience from mental health care facilities, regarding their perception of coercive treatment. International legislation justifies human rights through the concept of human dignity, which lays a foundation for its&amp;rsquo; relevance in this study. International organisations also advocate for reducing the enforcement of coercive treatment in mental health care facilities. This research project examines the possible impact coercive treatment may have on the dignity of persons in mental health care treatment, seen from their own perspective. The study explores relevant academic literature on the topic of coercion and develop an understanding of dignity through selected elements of Kantian- inspired theories. The relation between coercive treatment and dignity is further discussed to answer the research questions. By illustrating the situation of persons, through their own perspective, the study aims to give them a voice in decision making regarding the coercive treatment that are enforced upon them.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Erfaringsbaserte</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Brastad, Emilie Kirkeby</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Status for det nye vilkåret om samtykkekompetanse etter psykisk helsevernloven § 3-3</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Psykisk helsevernloven</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Samtykkekompetanse</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12/2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://munin.uit.no/bitstream/handle/10037/15144/thesis.pdf?sequence=2&amp;isAllowed=y</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">UiT, juridisk fakultet</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tromsø</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Avhandlingen er en rettsdogmatisk oppgave der praksis fra lagmannsretten og Høyesterett blir undersøkt og vurdert for å finne gjeldende rett etter den nye vilkåret om samtykkekompetanse. Hovedtyngden i oppgaven er i avhandlingens del 5. Denne delen består av en analyse av 14 lagmannsrettsdommer og én Høyesterettsdom som alle har blitt avsagt etter innføringen av det nye vilkåret. For å analysere innholdet i samtykkekompetansevurderingen er analysen delt inn i flere vurderingsmomenter, og lagmannsrettspraksisen blir vurdert i lys av den nylige avsagte dommen i HR-2018-2204-A.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master thesis</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">etikk, tvangsinnleggelse</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aslak Syse</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Store endringer i psykisk helsevernloven</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tidsskrift for psykisk helsearbeid</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">juss</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Psykisk helsevernloven</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Samtykkekompetanse</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.idunn.no/tph/2018/02-03/store_endringer_i_psykisk_helsevernloven</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Kritisk gjennomgang av psykisk helsevernloven, med fokus på lovendringen som trådte i kraft i 2017&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02-03</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">236</style></section><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Etikk, Juss</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Olaf Gjerløw Aasland</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tonje Lossius Husum</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reidun Førde</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reidar Pedersen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Store forskjeller i holdninger til tvang blant fagfolk i psykiatrien</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Holdninger</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Psykiater</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Psykolog</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvang</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://tidsskriftet.no/2018/05/debatt/store-forskjeller-i-holdninger-til-tvang-blant-fagfolk-i-psykiatrien</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">138</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Som et ledd i myndighetenes forsøk på å redusere bruk av tvang i psykisk helsevern fikk Senter for medisinsk etikk ved Universitetet i Oslo i 2011&amp;nbsp;midler til et bredt anlagt prosjekt. Formålet var å bidra til mer kunnskap om etiske utfordringer ved bruk av tvang og hvordan slike best kan håndteres. Et sentralt delprosjekt for å redusere tvangsbruk var å prøve ut og evaluere etiske refleksjonsgrupper på avdelingsnivå (&lt;a href=&quot;https://tidsskriftet.no/2018/05/debatt/store-forskjeller-i-holdninger-til-tvang-blant-fagfolk-i-psykiatrien#ref1&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I samarbeid med Legeforskningsinstituttet (LEFO) var et annet delprosjekt å gjennomføre en nasjonal spørreundersøkelse blant de fem vanligste yrkesgruppene i psykisk helsevern og rusvern; psykiatere, psykologer, sykepleiere, andre fagutdannede og hjelpeyrker, bl.a. for å kartlegge yrkesmessige forskjeller. Et av målene var å undersøke holdninger til tvang. Den første artikkelen fra dette delprosjektet er nylig publisert (&lt;a href=&quot;https://tidsskriftet.no/2018/05/debatt/store-forskjeller-i-holdninger-til-tvang-blant-fagfolk-i-psykiatrien#ref2&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;), og vi ønsker her å dele resultatene med en bredere offentlighet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Via aktuelle fagorganisasjoner ble det sendt elektroniske spørreskjemaer til alle medlemmer som arbeidet med psykisk helse eller rus, til sammen 15 576 i hele landet. Med denne indirekte utsendelsen var det ikke mulig å purre, og svarprosenten var 7,5 (1 160/15 576). I spørreskjemaet var det seks kliniske situasjoner hvor bruk av tvang kunne være aktuelt (&lt;a href=&quot;https://tidsskriftet.no/2018/05/debatt/store-forskjeller-i-holdninger-til-tvang-blant-fagfolk-i-psykiatrien#box1&quot;&gt;ramme 1&lt;/a&gt;). I hver vignett var det foreslått 3&amp;ndash;5 handlingsalternativer, der minst ett innebar bruk av tvang. På to av vignettene (D og E) var noen av alternativene ulovlige, men dette var ikke nevnt i spørreskjemaet.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></issue><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Beck, Nora Berit</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Strafferettslig og helserettslig tvungent psykisk helsevern</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">strafferettslig</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvungent psykisk helsevern</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Utilregnelighet</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">03/2919</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/67006/1/514.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">UiO, Det juridiske fakultet</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oslo</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Sammendrag finnes ikke&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master thesis</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>46</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Folkehelseinstituttet, FHI</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Systematisk kartleggingsoversikt: Tvangsmedisinering i psykisk helsevern</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.fhi.no/publ/2018/tvangsmedisinering-i-psykisk-helsevern--en-systematisk-kartleggingsoversikt/</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsbehandling, Statistikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Elin Håkonsen Martinsen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bente M Weimand</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reidar Pedersen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reidun Norvoll</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The silent world of young next of kin in mental healthcare</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nursing Ethics</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Children of parents with a mental illness,ethics,family ethics,family support,mental healthcare,sibling caregivers</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Background:Young next of kin to patients with mental health problems are faced with many challenges. It is important to focus on the special needs of children and adolescents as next of kin to ensure their welfare and prevent harm.Research questions:We aimed to investigate young next of kin&amp;rsquo;s need for information and involvement, to examine the ways they cope with situations involving coercion related to the treatment of their relative, and to identify ethical challenges.Research design:We conducted a qualitative study based on semi-structured, individual interviews.Participants and research context:Seven young next of kin aged 14&amp;ndash;22 years participated in the study. The informants were recruited from a regional hospital trust in Norway.Ethical considerations:The study was approved by the National Data Protection Official for Research and based upon informed consent and confidentiality.Findings:The adolescents wanted more information and described a need for increased interaction with their sick relative at the hospital. They struggled to keep their relationship with their relative intact, and they described communication problems in the family. Coercive treatment was perceived in a negative way.Discussion:The study finds that there are ethical challenges at stake for young next of kin and their families other than those that are often emphasized by traditional healthcare, which often focuses on the individual patient&amp;rsquo;s rights. These challenges are related to the young next of kin&amp;rsquo;s needs for interconnectedness and for the preservation of relationships as well as challenges related to family communication and the need for information.Conclusion:The study finds a need for more family-oriented perspectives in both mental healthcare practices and healthcare ethics.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Erfaringsbaserte</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bert Molewijk</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Almar Kok</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tonje Husum</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reidar Pedersen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Olaf Aasland</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Staff’s normative attitudes towards coercion: the role of moral doubt and professional context—a cross-sectional survey study</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BMC Medical Ethics</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year></dates><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">18</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">37</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Etikk, Tvangsinnleggelse</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Briskodden, Anders Lafton</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Straffri, men fengslet: Overføring fra tvungent psykisk helsevern til anstalt under kriminalomsorgen, jf. psykisk helsevernloven § 5-6</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EMK artikkel 5</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">overføring til anstalt under kriminalomsorgen</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">prøveløslatelse</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">psykisk helsevernloven § 5-6</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">straff</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">straffrihet</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tilregnelighet</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvungent psykisk helsevern</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2017</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/56549/1/545.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">UiO, Det juridiske fakultet</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oslo</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Denne oppgaven tar for seg den spesielle problemstilling at en person som er straffri fordi han eller hun på handlingstiden var utilregnelig, og som etter strl. &amp;sect; 62 er idømt tvungent psykisk helsevern, senere overføres til anstalt under kriminalomsorgen i medhold av psykisk helsevernloven &amp;sect; 5-6. I praksis vil dette si at en straffri person på ubestemt tid plasseres innenfor et fengsels murer. Oppgaven foretar en analyse av vilkårene for at en slik overføring kan skje, hvor bestemmelsens forhold til Den europeiske menneskerettskonvensjon (EMK) artikkel 5 nr. 1 er sentralt. Noen prosessuelle problemstillinger blir berørt, og da særlig adgangen til å prøveløslate den overførte på samme måte som en forvaringsfange. Dessuten blir det innledningsvis fortatt en gjennomgang av de viktigste vilkårene for å idømme straff i Norge, samt for å avsi dom på tvungent psykisk helsevern.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master thesis</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Camilla Bjerkli</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Setter Grunnloven skranker for bruk og anvendelse av belteseng i norsk psykiatri?</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">belter</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">grunnloven</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">lovgrunnlag</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mekaniske tvangsmidler</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">rettssikkerhet</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/52005/210.pdf?sequence=1&amp;isAllowed=y</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">UiO, Det juridiske fakultet</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Tema for denne avhandlingen er bruk av belteseng som tvangsmiddel i norsk psykiatri. Oppgavens problemstilling er å gjøre rede for hvilke skranker som følger av Grunnloven i forbindelse med norsk praksis rundt bruk av belteseng som tvangsmiddel. Det vil gjøres rede for utvalgte situasjoner som forekommer i norsk praksis ved bruk av belteseng. Disse situasjonene vil bli vurdert opp mot menneskerettighetene i Grunnloven.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The theme of this thesis is use of mechanical restraint as a coercive measure in Norwegian psychiatry. The thesis will try to answer which limits the Norwegian Constitution sets for use of mechanical restraint in Norway. Selected situations that occur in Norwegian practice around mechanical restraint, will be discussed. These situations will be evaluated againt human rights in the Norwegian Constitution.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mastergradsoppgave</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvangsmidler, etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thomas Bull</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">André Birkelund</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Skjerming av psykotiske pasienter</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">akuttpost</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">akuttpsykiatri</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">psykose</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">psykotisk</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Skjerming</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sykepleie</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://brage.inn.no/inn-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2394807/Bull%20og%20Birkelund.pdf?sequence=1&amp;isAllowed=y</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Høgskolen i Innlandet</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Denne oppgaven tar for seg hvordan sykepleiere håndterer skjerming som en metode på en akuttpsykiatrisk avdeling. Vi har valgt å bruke litteraturstudie som metode og har derfor brukt anerkjente forfattere som Cullberg, Strand, Hummelvoll, Skårderud, Haugsgjerd, &amp;amp; Stänicke. Oppgaven vår er avgrenset til å handle om hvordan sykepleiere bruker skjerming som en metode på en skuttpsykiatrisk avdeling. Teoridelen består av psykose, symptomer og behandling av psykose, egostyrkende sykepleie, vold og utagering, lovverk. Som sykepleieteoretisk referanse så bruker vi Jan Kåre Hummelvoll og Liv Strand. Drøftingsdelen består av tre kapitler som tar for seg skjerming og bruken av skjerming på en akuttpsykiatrisk avdeling, egostyrkende sykepleie, hvordan man kan forebygge vold og utagering. Helt til slutt blir lovverket rundt bruken av skjerming og aktuelt lovverk drøftet. Vi avslutter med en oppsummering av de funn vi har gjort i løpet av oppgaveperioden, og noen tanker rundt problemstillingen.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bacheloroppgave</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvangsmidler</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Håkon Milde</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Straff eller omsorg? Pasienter og pleiepersonells syn på skjerming</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">pasientopplevelse</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">pleiepersonell</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Skjerming</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sykepleie</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">VID vitenskapelige høgskole</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Formål: Formålet med oppgaven er å belyse hvordan&amp;nbsp;&lt;mark&gt;skjerming&lt;/mark&gt;&amp;nbsp;oppleves for pasientene innlagt på psykiatrisk sykehus. Fokuset vil være på holdninger til og bruken av&amp;nbsp;&lt;mark&gt;skjerming&lt;/mark&gt;. Det er også lagt vekt på hvordan&amp;nbsp;&lt;mark&gt;skjerming&lt;/mark&gt;&amp;nbsp;som metode brukes i dagens psykiatriske sykehus opp mot hvordan intensjonen var når den ble innført for over 30 år siden. Dette for å skape en bredere forståelse for den komplekse skjermingsprosessen. Problemstilling: &amp;rdquo;Hvordan påvirker pleiepersonells holdninger hvordan pasienter opplever&amp;nbsp;&lt;mark&gt;skjerming&lt;/mark&gt;?&amp;rdquo; Metode: I denne oppgaven er det benyttet litteraturstudie som metode for å knytte relevant teori og forskning opp mot valgt problemstilling. Konklusjon: Litteraturen viser at&amp;nbsp;&lt;mark&gt;skjerming&lt;/mark&gt;, til tross for å være en omdiskutert og dårlig dokumentert metode er svært hyppig brukt. Forskning viser at det er en markant uoverensstemmelse mellom hvordan&amp;nbsp;&lt;mark&gt;skjerming&lt;/mark&gt;&amp;nbsp;oppfattes av pleiepersonell og pasienter. Studier viser at pasienter på generell basis uttrykker svært negative følelser ovenfor&amp;nbsp;&lt;mark&gt;skjerming&lt;/mark&gt;, særlig knyttet til lite konsekvent bruk og tvangspreg. Mens pleiepersonell anser metoden som et nødvendig tiltak som høyst terapeutisk for pasienten. Dette markerer et stort behov for en definisjons avklaring samt videre forskning på feltet, for å avdekke forbedringsområder.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bacheloroppgave</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvangsmidler</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reidun Norvoll</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Torleif Ruud</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Torfinn Hynnekleiv</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Skjerming i akuttpsykiatrien</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://tidsskriftet.no/article/3275621</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsmidler</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>12</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Svein Friis</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Skjerming – straff eller støtte?</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://tidsskriftet.no/article/3273796</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsmidler</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Maren Grini</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">«Stor sannsynlighet» - En tolking og vurdering av det eksplisitte beviskravet «stor sannsynlighet» som kommer til uttrykk i vilkårene for å fatte vedtak om tvungent psykisk helsevern i psykisk helsevernloven § 3-3 nummer 3 bokstav a.</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-48645</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Universitetet i Oslo, Det juridiske fakultet</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Skorpen, F.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thorsen, A. A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Forsberg, C.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rehnsfeldt, A. W.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Suffering related to dignity among patients at a psychiatric hospital</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nursing Ethics</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dignity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">patient</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">psychiatric hospital</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Q-methodology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">suffering</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://nej.sagepub.com/content/21/2/148.full.pdf+html</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">148-62</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">0969-7330</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><auth-address><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; Stord/Haugesund University College, Norway.</style></auth-address><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Skorpen, F.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thorsen, A. A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Forsberg, C.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rehnsfeldt, A. W.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Suffering related to dignity among patients at a psychiatric hospital</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nurse Ethics</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24046222?dopt=Abstract</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">148-62</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kristin Andersen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Skjerming som metode i akuttpsykiatrisk avdeling. En studie av noen sykepleieres erfaringer</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Medisinske fakultet. Sykepleiervitenskap.</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/123456789/28212</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Universitetet i Oslo</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DUO . Digitale utgivelser ved UiO</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsmidler </style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>36</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reidun Norvoll</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tonje Lossius Husum</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Som natt og dag? - Om forskjeller i forståelse mellom misfornøyde brukere og ansatte om bruk av tvang.</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.psykiskhelse.no/novus/upload/file/dokumenter/som_natt_og_dag_mars2011.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Arbeidsforskningsinstituttet</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsbehandling, Tvangsmidler, Erfaringsbaserte, Tvangsinnleggelse</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>32</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tonje Lossius Husum</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Staff attitudes and use of coercion in acute psychiatric wards in Norway</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Medisinske fakultet</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/123456789/27999</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Universitetet i Oslo</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DUO. Digitale utgivelser for UIO</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Doktor</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Doktor</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsbehandling, Tvangsmidler</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anne Opsal</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Øistein Kristensen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Torleif Ruud</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tor K. Larsen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rolf W. Grawe</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thomas Clausen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Substance abuse in patients admitted voluntarily and involuntarily to acute psychiatric wards: a national cross-sectional study</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Norsk EpidemiologiNorsk Epidemiologi</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lena Kristine Bugge Nordberg</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Suicidalitet og tvang. Juridiske og etiske aspekter ved bruk av tvang overfor suicidale pasienter.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Medisinske fakultet</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/123456789/29489</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Universitetet i Oslo</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DUO. Digitale utgivelse for UIO</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anine Terland</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Samme bruker - ulike lovbestemmelser - samme rettsikkerhet? Om bruk av tvang hjemlet i sosialtjenestelovens kapittel 4A og pasientrettighetslovens kapittel 4A</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Det medisinske fakultet. Helseledelse og helseøkonomi.</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/123456789/30198</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Universitetet i Oslo</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DUO. Digitale utgivelser ved UIO.</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tonje Lossius Husum</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Johan Håkon Bjørngaard</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Arnstein Finset</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Torleif Ruud</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Staff attitudes and thoughts about the use of coercion in psychiatric  acute wards</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00127-010-0259-2</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsmidler</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>32</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Marit Følsvik Svindseth</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A Study of Humiliation, Narcissism and Treatment Outcome in Patients Admitted to Psychiatric Emergency Units</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Det medisinske fakultet, Institutt for nevromedisin</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://ntnu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A442876&amp;dswid=-9728</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Doktor</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsbehandling. Tvangsmidler</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Marit F. Svindseth</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jim Aage Nøttestad</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alv A. Dahl</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A study of outcome in patients treated at a psychiatric emergency unit</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nordic Journal of Psychiatry</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/08039481003690273?journalCode=psc</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">64</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsbehandling</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gunni Egeli</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Samtykke til psykisk helsevern og forholdet mellom frivillighet og tvang</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Juridiske fakultet</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/123456789/22078</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Universitetet i Oslo</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DUO: Digitale utgivelser ved UIO</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hanan Koleib</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Skjerming i akuttpsykiatriske avdelinger</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">akuttpsykiatri</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">pasientopplevelse</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Skjerming</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://uis.brage.unit.no/uis-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/184089/Koleib%2c%20Hanan.pdf?sequence=3&amp;isAllowed=y</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">UiS</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stavanger</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Denne masteroppgaven handler om skjerming i akuttpsykiatriske avdelinger.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hensikten med studien er å peke på noen utfordringer personalet møter i sitt daglige arbeid med skjermingspasienter. På denne måten skal dette være et bidrag til å skape en større forståelse for betydningen av god relasjon til skjermet pasient, slik at både skjermet pasienten og personalet kan få det best mulig sammen.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Skjerming er et svært utfordrende tiltak å gjennomføre for personalet, og sett krav til kunnskap og erfaring på dette området. Jeg har på bakgrunn av dette utarbeidet følgende problemstilling for denne studien: Hvordan beskriver personalet skjerming og betingelse for en god relasjon i forhold til skjerming slik at pasientenes integritet og verdighet ivaretas?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ut ifra studiens problemstilling og teoretiske referanseramme, har jeg valgt en kvalitativ tilnærming. Det &amp;rdquo;Kvalitative forskningsintervju&amp;rdquo; er metoden. Studiens informanter ble valgt ut gjennom et skjønnsmessig utvalg. Utvalget består av 7 erfarne informanter som alle arbeider med skjermingspasientgruppen ved den akuttpsykiatriske avdelingen. En halvstrukturert intervjuguide ble brukt som utgangspunkt for intervjuene. Intervjuet ble tatt opp på lydbånd. Til slutt denne type studien representerer en hermeneutisk prosess der deler og helheter har betydning for hverandre og utvikler en dypere forståelse for temaet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Datasamlingen har fremkommet gjennom syv forskningsintervjuer med utvalget 7 erfarne informanter. Gjennom en kvalitativ tilnærming er det foretatt en tematisk analyse.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Studiens funn viser at gode relasjoner mellom pasient og personale er en grunnleggende faktor i en virksom skjerming. I denne relasjonen vil personalets faglige kompetanse, mellommenneskelige kompetanse og personlig egnethet spille en avgjørende rolle. Resultatene viser at personalet ut i fra et humanistisk grunnsyn, med holdninger styrt av verdiene respekt, bekreftelse, lytting, forståelse, aksept og toleranse, gir et godt utgangspunkt for god relasjon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Studien viser en del dilemma som kan legge hindringer for en utvikling av god relasjon. I en skjermingssituasjon må det utvikles en faglig bevissthet i forhold til hva begrensningene begrunnes i. Materialet viser også at kompetansen må styrkes, og at språket har en stor betydning i relasjonsbyggingen og at dialogen skapes og utvikles. Materialet kan også bidra til å forklare og begrunne dagens skjerming praksis.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mastergradsoppgave</style></work-type></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tonje Lossius Husum</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Arnstein Finset</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Torleif Ruud</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale(SACS): Reliability, validity and feasibility.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">International Journal of Law and Psychiatry</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252708000952</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsmidler</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Knut W. Sørgaard</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Satisfaction and coercion among voluntary, persuaded/pressured and committed patients in acute psychiatric treatment</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00458.x/abstract</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nina Camilla Wergeland</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Skjerming - ei tvitydig omsorg : kva kan vere best muleg skjerming for personar i psykotisk krise?</style></title><tertiary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet</style></tertiary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://hdl.handle.net/10037/1331</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Universitetet i Tromsø (Open Access)</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsmidler</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Leif Johnsen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Haldis Øysæd</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Katrine Børnes</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tor Jocob Moe</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jan Haavik</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A systematic intervention to improve patient information routines and satisfaction in a psychiatric emergency unit</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nordic Journal of Psychiatry</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08039480701352579</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">61</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse, Tvangsbehandling</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">arne vaaler</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gunnar Morken</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">John Chr Fløvig</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Valentina C Iversen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Olav M Linaker</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Substance abuse and recovery in a Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gen Hospital Psychiatry</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">picu</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">rop</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">rus</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Seclusion</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Skjerming</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2006</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834305001507?via%3Dihub</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">28</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">65-70</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;The purpose of this study is to compare the development in symptoms, behaviors, function and treatment between patients with or without a substance use (SU) diagnose in a Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;A total of 118 admitted patients were assessed at admittance, day 3 and discharge from the PICU. Symptoms of psychopathology, therapeutic steps taken, violent episodes and length of patient stay were recorded.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;More males than females received an SU diagnosis. Substance use patients had less psychiatric symptoms at admittance and showed a faster symptom reduction, more favorable and faster improvement of function and a shorter length of stay. Except for symptom reduction and shorter length of stay, these differences were largely due to differences in sex and diagnoses in the two groups.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;In a naturalistic group of patients in a PICU, SU is associated with favorable outcomes compared to patients not using substances.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Doktorgradsavhandling</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvangsmidler</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rolf Wynn</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Staff's attitudes to the use of restraint and seclusion in a Norwegian university psychiatric hospital</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nordic Journal of Psychiatry</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2003</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08039480310003470</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">57</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsmidler, Tvangsbehandling</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rolf Wynn</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Staff's Choice of Formal And Informal Coercive Interventions In Psychiatric Emergencies</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">International Journal of Forensic Mental Health</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2003</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14999013.2003.10471187</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsmidler</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Brekke, Camilla</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Straffelovens nye særreaksjoner : En fremstilling og vurdering av reglene om straffelovens særreaksjoner forvaring og dom på overføring til tvungent psykisk helsevern</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">dom</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">overføring</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Straffeloven</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">særreaksjon</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvungent psykisk helsevern</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2003</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">03/2013</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/18956/1/thesis.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">UiO, Det juridiske fakultet</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oslo</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Sammendrag finnes ikke&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master thesis</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jan Stensland Holte</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&quot;Som en livbøye i et opprørt hav…&quot; Skjerming - teoretisk begrunnelse og praktisk gjennomføring.</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2001</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/133998</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>36</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jan Stensland Holte</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Skjerming : teoretisk begrunnelse og praktisk gjennomføring</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2000</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.nb.no/idtjeneste/URN:NBN:no-bibsys_brage_30472</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nasjonalbiblioteket (BRAGE)</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsmidler</style></label></record></records></xml>