<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anne-Marthe Rustad Indregard</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hans Martin Nussle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Milada Hagan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Per Olav Vandvik</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Martin Teli</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jakov Gather</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nikolaj Kunøe</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open-door policy versus treatment-as-usual in urban psychiatric inpatient wards: a pragmatic, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial in Norway</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lancet Psychiatry</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2024</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2024</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38460529/</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;h2&gt;Abstract&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;Open-door policy is a recommended framework to reduce coercion in psychiatric wards. However, existing observational data might not fully capture potential increases in harm and use of coercion associated with open-door policies. In this first randomised controlled trial, we compared coercive practices in open-door policy and treatment-as-usual wards in an urban hospital setting. We hypothesised that the open-door policy would be non-inferior to treatment-as-usual on the proportion of patients exposed to coercive measures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;We conducted a pragmatic, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing two open-door policy wards and three treatment-as-usual acute psychiatric wards at Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital in Oslo, Norway. An exemption from the consent requirements enabled inclusion and random allocation of all patients admitted to these wards using an open list (2:3 ratio) administrated by a team of ward nurses. The primary outcome was the proportion of patient stays with one or more coercive measures, including involuntary medication, isolation or seclusion, and physical and mechanical restraints. The non-inferiority margin was set to 15%. Primary and safety analyses were assessed using the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ISRCTN registry and is complete, ISRCTN16876467.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;Between Feb 10, 2021, and Feb 1, 2022, we randomly assigned 556 patients to either open-door policy wards (n=245; mean age 41&amp;middot;6 [SD 14&amp;middot;5] years; 119 [49%] male; 126 [51%] female; and 180 [73%] admitted to the ward involuntarily) or treatment-as-usual wards (n=311; mean age 41&amp;middot;6 [4&amp;middot;3] years; 172 [55%] male and 138 [45%] female; 233 [75%] admitted involuntarily). Data on race and ethnicity were not collected. The open-door policy was non-inferior to treatment-as-usual on all outcomes: the proportion of patient stays with exposure to coercion was 65 (26&amp;middot;5%) in open-door policy wards and 104 (33&amp;middot;4%) in treatment-as-usual wards (risk difference 6&amp;middot;9%; 95% CI -0&amp;middot;7 to 14&amp;middot;5), with a similar trend for specific measures of coercion. Reported incidents of violence against staff were 0&amp;middot;15 per patient stay in open-door policy wards and 0&amp;middot;18 in treatment-as-usual wards. There were no suicides during the randomised controlled trial period.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interpretation:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;The open-door policy could be safely implemented without increased use of coercive measures. Our findings underscore the need for more reliable and relevant randomised trials to investigate how a complex intervention, such as open-door policy, can be efficiently implemented across health-care systems and contexts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Funding:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority and The Research Council of Norway.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fagfellevurdert artikkel</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">330</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gabriela Miranda</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Maria Gabrielle Lind</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Omsorg under bruk av mekanisk tvang innen psykisk helsevern</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">belter</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mekaniske tvangsmidler</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">omsorg</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://hvlopen.brage.unit.no/hvlopen-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2761647/Lind_Miranda.pdf?sequence=2&amp;isAllowed=y</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Høgskulen på Vestlandet, bachelor i vernepleie</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Within mental health care, there are several coercive measures. We have chosen to focus on mechanical restraint, which can be seen as the most intrusive coercive measure patients can experience. Therefore, our issue was the following: &amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo;How can the social worker provide the best possible care to the patient in situations where mechanical restraint is used during mental health care&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo;. In this task the user perspective is the main focus. As methods we searched for literature on the issue and used qualitative interviews.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Using these methods, we found many factors that affect the experience of mechanical restraint. This included communication, presence, recognition, respect, understanding and empathy from staff who were in the situation with them. We have discussed the results from our selected article: &amp;laquo;Variables Associated With the Subjective Experience of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Inpatients: A Systematic Review&amp;raquo;. We have also used various literature books. Finally, we will provide a summary and conclusion.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bacheloroppgave</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvangsmidler</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Astri Mia Sve</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Omfang og variasjon i tvungen behandling av spiseforstyrrelser i Norge, 2013-2017</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">omfang</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Spiseforstyrrelser</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsbehandling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">variasjon</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2656652/no.ntnu%3ainspera%3a48513497%3a9771716.pdf?sequence=1&amp;isAllowed=y</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NTNU, Institutt for samfunnsmedisin og sykepleie</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Studiens bakgrunn: Bruk av tvungen behandling er kontroversielt, både nasjonalt og internasjonalt. Dette gjelder også for pasienter med alvorlige spiseforstyrrelser, men likevel kan tvang fremstå som nødvendig i enkelte tilfeller. Det foreligger ingen oversikt over hvor mange pasienter med alvorlige spiseforstyrrelser som legges inn og behandles med tvang i Norge.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hensikt: Det er et tverrpolitisk mål å redusere all uhensiktsmessig bruk av tvungent psykisk helsevern. En kartlegging av omfang og variasjon av tvungen innleggelse, samt bruk av tvangsbehandling og tvangsmidler i perioden 2013-2017, vil være et viktig kunnskapsgrunnlag for å forbedre kvaliteten av tvangsbruk for pasienter med spiseforstyrrelser.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Metode: Studien benytter kvantitativ metode med spørreskjema som datainnsamlingsmetode. Statistikkprogrammet SPSS ble benyttet for å analysere resultatene. Deskriptiv statistikk med krysstabeller ble benyttet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Resultater: Av de 177 avdelinger og institusjoner som fikk tilsendt spørreskjema, anga 15 % å ha hatt pasienter med spiseforstyrrelser på TPH i den aktuelle perioden. Studien inkluderte data fra 260 innleggelser og 148 unike pasienter der TPH ble benyttet. I alt 71 % var registret med én innleggelse i løpet av perioden, mens 12 % var registrert med tre eller flere innleggelser. Av samtlige pasienter var 97 % kvinner og 3 % menn. Bruken av tvungen behandling og tvangsmidler ser ut til å variere i de ulike regionene. Studien viser at 60 % av pasientene rapporterte om traumehistorikk, hvor 45 % av disse rapporterte om flere traumer i kombinasjon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Konklusjon: Relativt få pasienter legges inn til tvungen behandling for spiseforstyrrelser i Norge, men bruk av tvungen behandling og tvangsmidler varierer mellom de ulike regionene. Det kan tyde på at omfanget av tvungen behandling kan reduseres. Over halvparten av pasientene som mottok tvungen behandling rapporterte om traumer. Det er behov for mer kunnskap for å utvikle behandlingstilnærminger som kan redusere bruk av tvang i psykisk helsevern for voksne med spiseforstyrrelser i Norge.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Background: The use of Involuntary treatment is controversial, both nationally and internationally. This also applies to patients with severe eating disorders, but nonetheless, coercion may appear necessary in some cases to save lives. There is no record of how many patients with severe eating disorders are admitted and forcibly treated in Norway.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Objective: It is a cross-political goal to reduce all inappropriate use of compulsory mental health care. A survey of the extent and variety of forced hospitalization, as well as the use of coercive treatment and coercive measures in the period 2013-2017, will be an important knowledge base for improving the quality of involuntary treatment for patients with eating disorders.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Method: The study uses a quantitative method with a questionnaire as data collection method. The SPSS statistics program was used to analyze the results. Descriptive statistics with cross tables were used.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Results: Of the 177 departments and institutions that were sent questionnaires, 15 % stated that they had patients with eating disorders who were involuntarily committed during the period. The study included data from 260 admissions covering 148 unique patients where Involuntary treatment were applied. A total of 71 % were registered with one admission during the period, while 12 % were registered with three or more admissions. Of all patients, 97 % were women and 3 % were men. The use of forced treatment and coercive measures seems to vary in the different regions. The study shows that 60 % of the patients reported trauma history, while 45 % reported multiple trauma in combination.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Conclusion: Relatively few patients are admitted to forced treatment for eating disorders in Norway, but the use of forced treatment and coercive measures varies between the different regions. This may indicate that the extent of forced treatment may be reduced. More than half of the patients receiving Involuntary treatment reported trauma. More knowledge is needed to develop treatment approaches that can reduce the use of coercion in mental health care for adults with eating disorders in Norway.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mastergradsoppgave</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsbehandling</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stellander, Eirik</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Organisasjonskultur, ledelse og tvang i psykisk helsevern</style></title><short-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Organizational culture, leadership and coercion in mental health care</style></short-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">akuttpsykiatri</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">helseledelse</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvang</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">07/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://nordopen.nord.no/nord-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2685712/Stellander.pdf?sequence=1&amp;isAllowed=y</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nord Universitet, Master i helseledelse</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bodø</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sammendrag&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Målet med denne oppgaven har vært å få innsikt i, og kunnskap om, hvordan enhetslederne ved akuttpostene ved Akuttpsykiatrisk seksjon ved Psykisk helse- og rusklinikken UNN HF, opplever organisasjonskulturen i egen enhet, og hvordan de tenker omkring sammenhengen mellom organisasjonskultur, ledelse og bruk av tvang i psykisk helsevern.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Problemstilling&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hvilken forståelse har enhetslederne ved Akuttpsykiatrisk seksjon av organisasjonskulturen i egen enhet, og på hvilken måte mener enhetsledere de kan påvirke organisasjonskulturen for å oppnå målet om redusert og kvalitetssikret bruk av tvang?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Metode&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kvalitativ forskning med semistrukturerte intervjuer med enhetslederne ved de tre akuttpostene ved Akuttpsykiatrisk seksjon. Metoden har en fenomenologisk, hermeneutisk og utforskende tilnærming til datagrunnlaget. Det er også innhentet sekundærdata om antall vedtak om skjerming og tvangsmidler ved Akuttpsykiatrisk seksjon i perioden 2015 &amp;ndash; 2019.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hovedfunn&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Enhetsledernes forståelse av organisasjonskultur er i tråd med de vanligst brukte definisjoner og teorier. Enhetslederne legger mest vekt på verdier og normer, og deres beskrivelse av kulturen i egen enhet passer best med den idealtypiske organisasjonskulturen &amp;quot;klan&amp;quot;. Enhetsledernes tanker om hva de kan gjøre for å påvirke organisasjonskulturen begrenser seg hovedsakelig til hva de selv direkte kan gjøre ovenfor personalet. Dette vitner om en noe begrenset forståelse av hvordan organisasjoner fungerer. Enhetslederne har en bred forståelse for hvilke organisatoriske trekk og faktorer som kan påvirke bruk av tvang i psykisk helsevern. Enhetslederne er enige om at en verdibasert og relasjonsorientert lederstil med fokus på integrasjon og tillitt vil være den mest hensiktsmessige og effektive måten å gå fram på for å skape en ønsket organisasjonskultur, og de har en holistisk tilnærming til målet om å oppnå redusert og kvalitetssikret bruk av tvang.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Konklusjon&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Enhetslederne har en adekvat og tilstrekkelig forståelse av, og kunnskap om, fenomenet organisasjonskultur, og sammenhengen mellom organisasjonskultur, ledelse og bruk av tvang.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Abstract&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The aim of this thesis was to explore how managers of acute psychiatric wards within the Acute Psychiatry Section of the Psychiatric Health- and Addiction Medicine Clinic at University hospital of North Norway, experience the culture in their own wards, and to gain insight in their thoughts about the relationship between organizational culture, leadership and coercion in mental health care.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Research question&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What understanding do the managers in the Acute Psychiatry Section have about the organizational culture in their own wards, and in what way do they think they can influence the culture to achieve a reduced and quality assured use of force?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Method&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The issue was explored using qualitative methodology with semi-structured interviews with the managers of the three acute psychiatric wards within the Acute Psychiatry Section. The methodology has a phenomenological, hermeneutic and explorative approach. I have also obtained data regarding the number of decisions to use seclusion and restraint against patients in the three acute psychiatric wards for the years 2015 &amp;ndash; 2019.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The managers understanding of organizational culture are in line with det most commonly used definitions and theories regarding this phenomenon. The managers experience of the culture in their own wards can best be described as an ideally typical &amp;quot;clan&amp;quot; culture. Their thoughts about what they can do to influence the culture are mostly limited to what they can do directly towards their own staff. This is an indication of a somewhat narrow understanding of how organizations work. The managers have a broad understanding of the organizational traits that can influence the use of force in psychiatric care, and they all agree that a valuebased leadership style with emphasis on relationships, integration and trust is the most expedient and efficient method to create a desired organizational culture.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The managers have an adequate understanding and sufficient knowledge of organizational culture, and the relationship between organizational culture, management and use of force.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master thesis</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">annet</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Løvsletten, M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Husum, T. L.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Granerud, A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Haug, E.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Outpatient commitment in mental health services from a municipal view</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Int. Journal of Law and Psychiatry</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Community Treatment Order</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CTO</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">kommune</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Outpatient commitment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">primærhelsetjeneste</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TUD</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvungent psykisk helsevern uten døgnopphold</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">03/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160252720300108?dgcid=author</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">69</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;h3 id=&quot;st0010&quot;&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p id=&quot;sp0025&quot;&gt;Outpatient commitment (OC) is a legal decision for compulsory mental health care when the patient stays in his or her own home. Municipal health-care workers have a key role for patients with OC decision, but little is known about how the legislation system with OC works from the municipality&amp;#39;s point of view.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 id=&quot;st0015&quot;&gt;Method&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p id=&quot;sp0030&quot;&gt;The present study has a quantitative descriptive design using an electronic questionnaire sent to health-care workers in the municipalities that participated. The study included health-care workers from the mental health services in two counties in Norway who have experience with psychosis and OC decisions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 id=&quot;st0020&quot;&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p id=&quot;sp0035&quot;&gt;There were 230 people who received the questionnaire. The sample consisted of various health professionals from both small and large municipalities.The results show which tasks they have in follow-up of patients in the municipalities.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 id=&quot;st0025&quot;&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p id=&quot;sp0040&quot;&gt;From the municipality&amp;#39;s point of view, there are no significant differences in follow-up for patients with or without an OC decision, apart from conversations about medication. An individual plan is rarely used to facilitate follow-up, although this is the statutory right of patients with OC decisions. The health-care workers lack knowledge and education about the OC scheme. The cooperation between municipalities and the specialist health-care services is not clearly defined.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TUD</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Syse, A.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Om endringene i psykisk helsevernloven fra 2017 - Mere juss og mindre fag?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dette brenner jeg for. Festskrift til Hege Brækhus 70 år</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">juss</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lovendring 2017</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Psykisk helsevernloven</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.fagbokforlaget.no/Dette-brenner-jeg-for/I9788245033120</style></url></web-urls></urls><edition><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></edition><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fagbokforlaget</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oslo</style></pub-location><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">514</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9788245033120</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Fagfellevurdert bokkapittel av Aslak Syse om endringene i psykisk helsevernloven fra&amp;nbsp;2017.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sider 483 - 504&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>36</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kvistad, H Elena Andrea</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Omsorg under bruk av mekanisk tvang i tvungent psykisk helsevern</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mekaniske tvangsmidler</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Høgskulen på Vestlandet, bachelor i vernepleie</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Mechanical restraint is one of the most interventional measures you can do to patients during involuntary psychiatric care. In this bachelor, I have selected this following issue: &amp;ldquo;How can the social educator provide best possible care in cases where mechanical restraints are used during involuntary psychiatric treatment?&amp;rdquo;. I have used qualitative interviews as method in my project. I have also been searching for literature about psychiatric care and the use of coercion in this field. In my results I have found a lot of factors that may affect the experiences from the procedure. Giving information during the procedure, physical presence and debriefing is some of the factors that is crucial for psychiatric patients experiences during the mechanical restraint situation. I have also discussed my results from my interview and from my included article &amp;laquo;Research article - Psychiatric patients experiences with mechanical restraints: An interview study&amp;raquo;. In addition to that, I have also included literature from separate books. In the end I want to give a conclusion and a summary of my bachelor.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bachelor Thesis</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvangsmidler</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Henriette Riley</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ekaterina Sharashova</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jorun Rugkåsa</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Olav Nyttingnes</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tore Buer Christensen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ann-Torunn Andersen Austegard</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Maria Løvsletten</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bjørn Lau</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Georg Høyer</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Out-patient commitment order use in Norway: incidence and prevalence rates, duration and use of mental health services from the Norwegian Outpatient Commitment Study</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BJPsych Open</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Community Treatment Order</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">OCT</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Outpatient commitment</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">09/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160252718301900</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;h3 id=&quot;sec_a1title&quot;&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p id=&quot;__p1&quot;&gt;Norway authorised out-patient commitment in 1961, but there is a lack of representative and complete data on the use of out-patient commitment orders.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 id=&quot;sec_a2title&quot;&gt;Aims&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p id=&quot;__p2&quot;&gt;To establish the incidence and prevalence rates on the use of out-patient commitment in Norway, and how these vary across service areas. Further, to study variations in out-patient commitment across service areas, and use of in-patient services before and after implementation of out-patient commitment orders. Finally, to identify determinants for the duration of out-patient commitment orders and time to readmission.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 id=&quot;sec_a3title&quot;&gt;Method&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p id=&quot;__p3&quot;&gt;Retrospective case register study based on medical files of all patients with an out-patient commitment order in 2008&amp;ndash;2012 in six catchment areas in Norway, covering one-third of the Norwegian population aged 18 years or more. For a subsample of patients, we recorded use of in-patient care 3 years before and after their first-ever out-patient commitment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 id=&quot;sec_a4title&quot;&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p id=&quot;__p4&quot;&gt;Annual incidence varied between 20.7 and 28.4, and prevalence between 36.5 and 48.9, per 100 000 population aged 18 years or above. Rates differed significantly between catchment areas. Mean out-patient commitment duration was 727 days (s.d. = 889). Use of in-patient care decreased significantly in the 3 years after out-patient commitment compared with the 3 years before. Use of antipsychotic medication through the whole out-patient commitment period and fewer in-patient episodes in the 3 years before out-patient commitment predicted longer time to readmission.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 id=&quot;sec_a5title&quot;&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p id=&quot;__p5&quot;&gt;Mechanisms behind the pronounced variations in use of out-patient commitment between sites call for further studies. Use of in-patient care was significantly reduced in the 3 years after a first-ever out-patient commitment order was made.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 id=&quot;sec_a6title&quot;&gt;Declaration of interest&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p id=&quot;__p6&quot;&gt;None.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sep; 5(5): e75</style></issue><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TUD</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Marit F Svindseth</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Opplevd krenkelse i innleggelsessituasjonen til akuttpsykiatrisk avdeling og assosiasjoner til negative hendelser samt kjønnsforskjeller (norsk utgave)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nordic Journal of Nursing Research</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year></dates><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">35</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Geir F Lorem</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Marie Steffensen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jartrud Frafjord</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Catharina EA wang</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Omsorg under tvang - En narrativ studie av pasienters fortellinger om tvang og psykisk helsevern</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tidsskrift for psykisk helsearbeid</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.idunn.no/ts/tph/2014/02/omsorg_under_tvang_-_en_narrativ_studie_av_pasienters_forte</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse, Tvangsmidler, Etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Karin Drivenes</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oppfølging av legemiddelbruken til pasienter underlagt tvungent psykisk helsevern uten døgnopphold</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Det matematisk-naturvitenskapelige fakultet</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-44014</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Universitet i Oslo</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master Thesis</style></work-type></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Olav Nyttingnes</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tonje L. Husum</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Omfang, utvikling og geografisk variasjon i bruk av tvang i psykisk helsevern i Norge.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Impuls. Tidsskrift for psykologi</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year></dates><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">64</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tnavgsmidler, Tvangsbehandling</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dag Øystein Langerud</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Omfanget av tvangsmiddelbruk i psykisk helsevern 2007-2009</style></title><tertiary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Institutt for psykososial helse </style></tertiary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/138836</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Universitetet i Agder</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsmiddelbruk, Statistikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Håvard Bäckström</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Omsorgens tvetydighet ved bruk av skjerming</style></title><tertiary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Avdeling for helsefag</style></tertiary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/146646</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Høyskolen i Nord-Trøndelag</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsmidler</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aina Ryttersveen Johansen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Omsorg under rammen av tvang</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://bibsys-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/dlDisplay.do?docId=BIBSYS_ILS093577206&amp;vid=NB</style></url></web-urls></urls><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">[Drammen]</style></pub-location><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">89 s., vedlegg</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Omholt, Per Thomas</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Overføring til tvungent psykisk helsevern : Nærmere om straffeloven § 39</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">dom</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">overføring</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Straffeloven</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">særreaksjon</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvungent psykisk helsevern</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2004</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">03/2013</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/19988/1/17895.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">UiO, Det juridiske fakultet</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oslo</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;I denne fremstillingen vil jeg ta for meg overføring til tvungent psykisk helsevern etter straffeloven &amp;sect; 39. Fremstillingen har fire problemstillinger. Den første er hva som ligger i de materielle vilkår i straffeloven &amp;sect; 39, og særlig hvilke lovbestemmelser som faller inn under lovbruddskategoriene i straffeloven &amp;sect; 39 nr. 1 og 2. Den andre problemstillingen er hvilke formelle vilkår som må foreligge for å idømme særreaksjonen, samt hvilke bestemmelser som gjelder mens reaksjonen løper. Den tredje problemstillingen omhandler spørsmålet om særreaksjonen er i samsvar med våre folkerettslige forpliktelser. Til slutt vil det bli foretatt en sammenlikning av den nye og den gamle særreaksjonen for psykotiske og bevisstløse, der spørsmålet er om den nye er bedre enn den gamle.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master thesis</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">etikk</style></label></record></records></xml>