<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Richter, D</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tilman, S</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Can coercion in psychiatry be justified? A theoretical adversarial collaboration approach</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">International Journal of Law and Psychiatry</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2025</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252725001049?dgcid=author</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">105</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Bruk av tvang i psykiatrien er et av de mest kontroversielle temaene i moderne helsevesen. Det finnes kliniske, juridiske og etiske argumenter både for å avskaffe og for å rettferdiggjøre tvang i psykiatrien. Argumentasjonene er ofte diametralt motsatte, slik at det virker vanskelig å videreutvikle diskusjonen. For å løse denne utilfredsstillende situasjonen har vi brukt en tilnærming som kalles &amp;laquo;adversarial collaboration&amp;raquo; (motstridende samarbeid) på dette temaet. De to forfatterne representerer fundamentalt forskjellige synspunkter på spørsmålet om legitimering av tvang i psykiatrien. Gjennom en metodisk styrt utveksling av argumenter ble det utviklet en rekke konsensus-hypoteser, dissens-hypoteser og generelle konsensus-hypoteser med dissens i detalj. De viktigste funnene inkluderer det faktum at antagonistene argumenterer fra helt forskjellige utgangspunkt i kjernen av argumentasjonen, nemlig generelle argumenter kontra individuelle kliniske tilfeller. I tillegg har antagonistene konsistente standpunkter på mange temaer. Det kan derfor konkluderes med at både de som er for og de som er imot avskaffelse av tvang i psykiatrien, argumenterer med gode intensjoner.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>36</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Brodie Paterson</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">James Taylor</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michael Bell</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ian McIntosh</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Christopher Stirling</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reframing human rights-based approaches to the misuse of restraint. A binary approach is needed</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN HEALTHCARE</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dignity</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2025</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2025</style></date></pub-dates></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Viewpoint</style></work-type></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anne-Marthe Rustad Indregard</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hans Martin Nussle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Milada Hagan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Per Olav Vandvik</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Martin Teli</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jakov Gather</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nikolaj Kunøe</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open-door policy versus treatment-as-usual in urban psychiatric inpatient wards: a pragmatic, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial in Norway</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lancet Psychiatry</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2024</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2024</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38460529/</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;h2&gt;Abstract&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;Open-door policy is a recommended framework to reduce coercion in psychiatric wards. However, existing observational data might not fully capture potential increases in harm and use of coercion associated with open-door policies. In this first randomised controlled trial, we compared coercive practices in open-door policy and treatment-as-usual wards in an urban hospital setting. We hypothesised that the open-door policy would be non-inferior to treatment-as-usual on the proportion of patients exposed to coercive measures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;We conducted a pragmatic, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing two open-door policy wards and three treatment-as-usual acute psychiatric wards at Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital in Oslo, Norway. An exemption from the consent requirements enabled inclusion and random allocation of all patients admitted to these wards using an open list (2:3 ratio) administrated by a team of ward nurses. The primary outcome was the proportion of patient stays with one or more coercive measures, including involuntary medication, isolation or seclusion, and physical and mechanical restraints. The non-inferiority margin was set to 15%. Primary and safety analyses were assessed using the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ISRCTN registry and is complete, ISRCTN16876467.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;Between Feb 10, 2021, and Feb 1, 2022, we randomly assigned 556 patients to either open-door policy wards (n=245; mean age 41&amp;middot;6 [SD 14&amp;middot;5] years; 119 [49%] male; 126 [51%] female; and 180 [73%] admitted to the ward involuntarily) or treatment-as-usual wards (n=311; mean age 41&amp;middot;6 [4&amp;middot;3] years; 172 [55%] male and 138 [45%] female; 233 [75%] admitted involuntarily). Data on race and ethnicity were not collected. The open-door policy was non-inferior to treatment-as-usual on all outcomes: the proportion of patient stays with exposure to coercion was 65 (26&amp;middot;5%) in open-door policy wards and 104 (33&amp;middot;4%) in treatment-as-usual wards (risk difference 6&amp;middot;9%; 95% CI -0&amp;middot;7 to 14&amp;middot;5), with a similar trend for specific measures of coercion. Reported incidents of violence against staff were 0&amp;middot;15 per patient stay in open-door policy wards and 0&amp;middot;18 in treatment-as-usual wards. There were no suicides during the randomised controlled trial period.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interpretation:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;The open-door policy could be safely implemented without increased use of coercive measures. Our findings underscore the need for more reliable and relevant randomised trials to investigate how a complex intervention, such as open-door policy, can be efficiently implemented across health-care systems and contexts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Funding:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority and The Research Council of Norway.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fagfellevurdert artikkel</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">330</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>23</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nina Øye Thorvaldsen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Uten tvangshjemmel kan liv og helse settes i fare</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">dagens medisin</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ambulanse</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvangshjemmel</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2023</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.dagensmedisin.no/uten-tvangshjemmel-kan-liv-og-helse-settes-i-fare/510939</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01-utgaven</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;h2 itemprop=&quot;description&quot;&gt;Det finnes et &amp;laquo;hjemmel-tomt&amp;raquo; rom som hindrer ambulansepersonell i å utøve jobben forsvarlig og trygt, og som fører til unødvendig bruk av politibistand. At ambulansepersonell mangler hjemmel til å bruke tvang, kan sette pasienters liv og helse i fare.&lt;/h2&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>36</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Raknerud, Kristin</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thevakumar, Thivyia</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hvordan kan sykepleier redusere opplevelsen av tvang til pasienter med schizofreni under skjerming i psykiatrisk enhet?</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Skjerming</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2672430</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NTNU, Institutt for helsevitenskap</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gjøvik</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;h5&gt;Sammendrag&lt;/h5&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kort beskrivelse av bacheloroppgaven:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hvert år er det mange tvangsvedtak som blir fattet i psykisk helsevern, og det er dokumentert hvor mange som blir skjermet. Noe som ikke er like mye dokumentert er hvor mange, eller omfanget av pasienter med diagnosen schizofreni som opplever mer tvang enn nødvendig i skjermede omgivelser i psykisk helsevern. Skjerming er å ivareta og beskytte pasienten, men også å hjelpe pasienten til indre samling, beskytte medpasienter, og gi personalet mer oversikt over pasientens tilstand.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hensikten med denne bacheloroppgaven er å synliggjøre hvordan sykepleieren kan redusere opplevelsen av tvang til pasienter med schizofreni under skjerming i psykiatrisk enhet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oppgavens metode består av en systematisk fremgangsmåte, som er benyttet for å samle informasjon og kunnskap for å belyse vår problemstilling. Vi har valgt databasene Svemed+, Cinahl og Scopus, som resulterte i 5 kvalitative vitenskapelige studier.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Funn gjort i forskningslitteratur og annen litteratur viser at pasientens grunnleggende behov blir satt på prøve under skjermede omgivelser. Det vises å være flere etiske, juridiske og mellommenneskelige utfordringer under behandlingen. Det er utfordrende å benytte tvang til pasienter med schizofreni, hvor praksisen kan ligge i grenseland mellom lovlig og ulovlig praksis. Funn tyder på at prioritering av aktivitetstilbud øker pasientens rett til selvbestemmelse og bevegelsesfrihet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Short description of the bachelor thesis:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Every year there are many compulsory interventions that are made in mental health care, and it is documented how many are screened. Something that is not as well documented is how many, or the extent of patients with schizophrenia in mental health care who experience more coercion than necessary in a sheltered environment in mental health care. Seclusion is to look after and protect the patient, but also to help the patient to inner collection, protect fellow patients, and give the staff more overview of the patient&amp;#39;s condition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The purpose of this bachelor thesis is to highlight how the nurse can reduce the experience of compulsion for patients with schizophrenia during seclusion in a psychiatric unit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The assignment&amp;#39;s method consists of a systematic approach, which is used to gather information and knowledge to elucidate our problem. We have selected the databases Svemed +, Cinahl and Scopus, which resulted in 5 qualitative scientific studies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Findings in research literature and other literature show that the patient&amp;#39;s basic needs are being put to the test during seclusion. There appear to be several ethical, legal and interpersonal challenges during treatment. Forcing patients with schizophrenia where the practice can lie in the borderlands between legal and illegal practice is challenging. Findings suggest that prioritizing activity offers increases a patient&amp;#39;s right to self-determination and freedom of movement.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bachelor Thesis</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvangsmidler</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Steinert T, Baumgardt J</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bechdolf A, Bühling-Schndowski F</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cole C, Flammer E</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jaeger S, Junghanss J</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kampmann, M</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mahler, L</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Muche, R</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Implementation of guidelines on prevention of coercion and violence (PreVCo) in psychiatry: a multicentre randomised controlled trial</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Frontiers in Psychiatry</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">clinical guidelines</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">coercive measures</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">evidence based treatment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Psychiatry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">quality management</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Restraint</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Seclusion</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">violence</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">09.15.2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">file:///C:/Users/jha041/Downloads/fpsyt-11-579176.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Coercive measures are among the most controversial interventions in psychiatry. There is a large discrepancy between the sheer number of high-quality guidelines and the small number of scientifically accompanied initiatives to promote and evaluate their implementation into clinical routine. In Germany, an expert group developed guidelines to provide evidence- and consensus-based recommendations on how to deal with violence and coercion in psychiatry.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>36</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Belsnes, ME</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thodesen, HU</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lovendring i lov om psykisk helsevern og følgene av de sett fra tre perspektiver: bruker-, helsepersonell og samfunnsperspektiv</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">brukerperspektiv</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">helsepersonell</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lovendring 2017</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">samfunnsperspektiv</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://hvlopen.brage.unit.no/hvlopen-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2658238/Belsnes_Thodesen.pdf?sequence=1</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Høgskulen på Vestlandet, bachelor i vernepleie</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bergen</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Tittel:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lovendring i lov om psykisk helsevern og følgene av de sett fra tre perspektiver: bruker-, helsepersonell- og samfunnsperspektiv.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Problemstilling:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hvilke følger har endringene i loven om psykisk helsevern fra 2017 på bruken av tvang i et bruker-, helsepersonell- og samfunnsperspektiv?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bakgrunn:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Vi ønsker å sette fokus på et tema som vi anser som særs viktig både for samfunnet, pasientgruppen og ikke minst vernepleierprofesjonen. Følgene av lovendringen er noe ene gruppemedlemmet selv har observert. Sammen har vi erfaring fra hvert vårt ståsted og har reflektert rundt både positive og negative sider rundt problemstillingen. Vi tar leserne med gjennom en rekke refleksjoner og benytter oss av relevante historier fra praksisfeltet. Bakgrunnen for å se på problemstillingen ut fra tre perspektiver er for å få et mer helhetlig bilde. Vi benytter oss særlig av to overordnede elementer; Fenomenologisk- og humanistisk perspektiv og Bronfenbrenners økologiske utviklingsmodell. Dette hjelper oss å ha et medmenneskelig fokus gjennom oppgaven og se tematikken innenfor ulike sammenhenger.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Abstract&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Title:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Law change to the Mental Health Act and its consequences from three perspectives: user, health personnel and society perspective.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Issue:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What are the consequences of the changes in the Mental Health Act of 2017 on the use of coercion in a user-, health personnel- and society perspective?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Background:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We want to focus on a topic that we consider to be especially important for the society, the patient group and, not least, the professional nursing profession.The consequence of the changes in the law is something that one of the group members has observed. Together we have experience from each of our positions and have reflected on both positive and negative aspects of the problem. We take our readers through a series of reflections and use relevant experiences from our work. The background for looking at the problem from three perspectives is to get a more comprehensive picture. We used two main elements; Phenomenological and humanistic perspective and Bronfenbrenner&amp;#39;s ecological model.This helped us to have a compassionate focus throughout the assignment and to see the topic within different contexts.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bachelor Thesis</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>36</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tellefsen, RF</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Midtbø, MK</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Relasjonens virkning: Bruk av terapeutisk relasjon i tvangsbehandling</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Coercion</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">involuntary treatment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">mental disorders</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">nurse-patient relationship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">psychiatric illness</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">psychiatric patient</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2659836</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Høgskulen på Vestlandet, bachelor i sykepleie</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bergen</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Abstract&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Introduction&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Many people will experience dealing with a psychiatric illness at some point throughout their lives, some will also experience coercive measures in their treatment. How can nurses create a good therapeutic relationship to those patients? And does it increase the chance of a better treatment outcome for the patient?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Theory&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Research on literature before the analysis suggests that the therapeutic relationship does not only affect the person itself, it can also have an impact on their treatment outcome. Communication is suggested as an important part on making a positive change.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Method&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This paper is a literature search and a bachelor thesis in nursing. The search for articles was performed with the help of a PICO-model on following databases: Cinahl, Medline, Pscychinfo, and Svemed+. The analysis consists of 5 qualitative studies and 1 systematic literature search found through a citation search on Google Scholar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Results&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Through the analysis there were found 4 underlying subjects; anatomy, trust and teamwork, the therapeutic relationships impact, perceptions and expectations of staff, and coercive measures evaluation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Discussion&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Verbal and nonverbal communication skills seemed to be important in the treatment as well as listening to the patients for a positive therapeutic relationship. Safety and respect were both mentioned as a way of meeting the patients&amp;rsquo; needs in context of the therapeutic relationship and treatment. A common ground about coercive measures seemed to matter, and the therapeutic relationship was especially important to secure good treatment using these measures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Conclusion&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nurses can use their communication skills as a tool and the therapeutic relationship needs to be built on respect, safety, trust and a common ground to make a positive outcome in treatment with involuntary measures. Some areas discussed needs further research.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Keywords Coercion, involuntary treatment, mental disorders, psychiatric patient, psychiatric illness, nurse-patient relationship.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bachelor Thesis</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvangsmidler, tvangsinnleggelse, etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>32</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rabben, Magne Brekke</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thomassen, Øyvind</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsmidler i norsk psykiatri ca. 1900–1950</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">psykiatrihistorie</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reitgjerdet</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sikkerhetspsykiatri</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvang</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.idunn.no/ht/2020/02/tvangsmidler_i_norsk_psykiatri_ca_19001950</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NTNU, Institutt for moderne samfunnshistorie</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Trondheim</style></pub-location><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">issn.1504-2944-2020-02-05</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p id=&quot;G1208655540&quot;&gt;Artikkelen gjør en historisk analyse av institusjonspsykiatriens etiske og faglige vurderinger og praksiser vedrørende tvangsmiddelbruk i perioden 1900&amp;ndash;1950. Artikkelen studerer den faglige debatten om tvang slik den har fremstått i læreverk i sinnssykepleie og den psykiatrifaglige debatten i perioden samt konkret praksis ved Reitgjerdet asyl fra åpningen i 1923. Reitgjerdet var en spesialinstitusjon for kriminelle og særlig vanskelige mannlige pasienter, men endte også opp med å ta imot og behandle pasienter som ikke tilfredsstilte de særskilte inntakskriteriene. Reitgjerdet hadde derfor en del spesielle utfordringer, men samtidig mange fellestrekk med landets regulære psykiatriske institusjoner.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p id=&quot;G825843807&quot;&gt;Artikkelens hovedpoeng er at den norske psykiatriske profesjonen ved starten av perioden knyttet den vitenskapelige psykiatriens opprinnelse til opplysningstidens humanisering av sinnssykebehandlingen og et mål om total avskaffelse av mekanisk tvang. Isolasjon og kjemiske tvangsmidler ble regnet som de mest humane alternativene. Fra 1940-tallet var imidlertid mekaniske tvangsmidler foretrukket, og artikkelen diskuterer årsaker til endringene.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Doctor Thesis</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvangsinnleggelse, tvangsmidler</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Magne Brekke Rabben</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Øyvind Thomassen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Humane treatment versus means of control: coercive measures in Norwegian high-security psychiatry, 1895–1978</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">History of Psychiatry</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Coercion</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Forensic psychiatry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">High-security</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Historical</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0957154X19867256</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">30</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;This article analyses the use of coercive measures in two national institutions for high-security psychiatry in Norway &amp;ndash; Kriminalasylet (Criminal Asylum) and Reitgjerdet &amp;ndash; during the period 1895&amp;ndash;1978. Historical study of coercion in psychiatry is a fruitful approach to new insight into the moral and ethical considerations within the institutions. We approach the topic through a qualitative study of patient case files and ward reports from the institutions&amp;rsquo; archives, as well as a comprehensive quantification of the coercive measures used. The data show shifting considerations of humane treatment and changes in the respect for human dignity in the institutions&amp;rsquo; practices. They also show that technological developments, such as the introduction of new psychopharmaceuticals, did not necessarily lead to higher standards of treatment.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Historical </style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">424</style></section><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsmidler, Tvangsinnleggelse, Tvangsbehandling</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>32</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rabben, Magne Brekke</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thomassen, Øyvind</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Humanitet, kontroll og tvang ved Kriminalasylet 1895–1915</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kriminalasylet</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">psykiatrihistorie</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sikkerhetspsykiatri</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvang</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.idunn.no/ht/2019/01/humanitet_kontroll_og_tvang_ved_kriminalasylet_18951915</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NTNU, Institutt for moderne samfunnshistorie</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Trondheim</style></pub-location><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">issn.1504-2944-2019-01-05</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Artikkelen analyserer tvang ved Kriminalasylet under asylets to første bestyrere, Waldemar Bødtker og Hans Evensen, i perioden 1895&amp;ndash;1915. Kriminalasylet var en spesialinstitusjon for mannlige kriminelle sinnssyke, og hadde som oppgave både å være en behandlingsanstalt og å sikre samfunnet fra potensielt farlige pasienter. Derfor hadde asylet i praksis en posisjon tilhørende både sinnssykeomsorgen og fengselsvesenet. Det var formelt en medisinsk institusjon, men ansvaret var lagt under Justisdepartementet. Artikkelen argumenterer for at bestyrerne av denne grunn hadde en todelt tilnærming til tvangsmiddelbruk. De fleste pasientene opplevde en hverdag i tråd med psykiatriens daværende idealer om human behandling, samtidig som enkeltpasienter som ble oppfattet som spesielt farlige, levde under et meget strengt tvangsregime med kontrollmetoder hentet fra fengselsvesenet. Dette illustreres gjennom pasienthistorier. Studien bygger blant annet på pasientjournaler og avdelingsrapporter fra asylets arkiv.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Doctor Thesis</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvangsinnleggelse, tvangsmidler</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tingulstad, Christina Ingeborg</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tilsyn og kontroll med tvang i psykisk helsevern. En analyse og vurdering av Kontrollkommisjonens og Fylkesmannens funksjon innenfor psykisk helsevern sett opp mot formålet om å sikre pasientenes rettigheter</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fylkesmannen</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Klage</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kontroll</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kontrollkommisjonen</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tilsyn</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvang</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/68831/5/661.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">UiO, Det juridiske fakultet</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oslo</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Sammendrag finnes ikke&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master thesis</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Terkelsen, T. B.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Larsen, I. B.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fear, danger and aggression in a Norwegian locked psychiatric ward: Dialogue and ethics of care as contributions to combating difficult situations</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nursing Ethics</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25552587</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></number><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><call-num><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse</style></call-num><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vera Thorvarsdottir</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ansattes subjektive opplevelse med å bli utsatt for krenkelser på arbeidsplassen i psykisk helsetjeneste - en kvalitativ studie</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Det samfunnsvitenskapelige fakultet</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-49009</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Universitet i Oslo</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master Thesis</style></work-type></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lise Kristine Alver Toverud</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Helsepersonells perspektiv på brukermedvirkning i en psykiatrisk avdeling</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Brukermedvirkning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">health professionals</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">helsepersonells perspektiv</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">mental illness</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tvang</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">use of coercion in mental health care</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">user participation</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://brage.inn.no/inn-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2368602/Toverud.pdf?sequence=1&amp;isAllowed=y</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Høgskolen i Innlandet, master i folkehelsevitenskap</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Norsk sammendrag: Bakgrunn: Brukermedvirkning er et viktig begrep innen folkehelse. Myndighetene har gjennom føringer og lovverk lagt rammen for brukermedvirkning, men forskning viser at idealene fra myndighetene ikke er helt forenlig med dagens realiteter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hensikt: Studiens hensikt er å se på helsepersonells erfaringer med brukermedvirkning, og hvilke forhold som femmer og svekker brukermedvirkning på deres arbeidsplass.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Problemstillingen: Hvordan er helsepersonells forståelse av brukermedvirkning hos pasienter innlagt på et psykiatrisk sykehus/avdeling.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Metode og deltagelse: Studien bygger på kvalitativ metode, og datamaterialet er innhentet ved 10 individuelle intervjuer. Hermeneutikk er benyttet som den metodiske tolkningsrammen.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Resultater: Informantene viste bred forståelse for brukermedvirkning, og påpekte viktigheten med å praktisere det. Helsepersonell mener at gode relasjoner og holdninger er viktige faktorer som fremmer brukermedvirkning. Samtidig som et godt samarbeid med ledelsen legger grunnlaget for praktisering. Praktiseringen av brukermedvirkning varierte hos de ansatte, mens noen var ildsjeler tok andre lettere på oppgaven. Forhold som kunne skape utfordringer med å fremme brukermedvirkning var det elektroniske systemet de var pålagt å bruke. Helsepersonell uttrykte stor frustrasjon over et system som ikke la tilrette for brukermedvirkning, og da særlig med tanke på utforming av behandlingsplaner, noe brukeren i liten grad deltok i. For brukere som er underlagt tvungent psykisk helsevern mente helsepersonell at brukermedvirkning kunne begrense seg til det minimale. Helsepersonell mener de har et godt samarbeid med pårørende, men samtidig utrykker noen at dette arbeidet er utfordrende. Informantene opplever det som krevende når bruker og helsepersonell har forskjellige syn på hva som er sykdomsbilde. Noen av informantene hevdet at i noen tilfeller vil det være riktig å realitetsorientere brukeren.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Konklusjon: Det kommer frem flere synspunkter som synes å stå i kontrast til både helseforetakets og helsetilsynets retningslinjer. Samtidig er disse signalene tvetydige i og med at det også åpnes for skjønnsbasert tvangsutøvelse. Mangel på vilje til å gi fra seg makten fra helsepersonells sin side setter en demping på praktiseringen av brukermedvirkning. Nøkkelbegreper: Brukermedvirkning, helsepersonell, psykiske lidelser, tvangsbruk i psykisk helsevesen.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;English abstract:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Background: User interaction is an important concept within the public health. The government has, through guidelines and legislations, made the frame for user interaction but research shows that the ideals of the government are not consistent with current ideals.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Purpose: The studys purpose is to look at health personel&amp;rsquo;s personal experience with user interaction, and the factors that promote or impair any user interaction at their work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Problem: How is the health personnel&amp;rsquo;s understanding of user interaction with patients hospitalized in a psychiatric ward?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Method and participants: The study is based on qualitative method and the data is collected using 10 individual interviews. Hermeneutics is used as the methodological framework of interpretation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Results: The informants showed a broad understanding of user interaction and pointed out the importance of practicing it. Health personel believe that good relations and attitudes are important factors that promote user interaction. A good working relationship with the management will at the same time lay down the groundwork for the practice. The practice of user interaction varied with the employees while some of them were enthusiasts others took the task easier. Circumstances which could create challenge to promote user interaction were the electronic system they were required to use. The health personnel expressed great frustration over a system that does not facilitate user interaction, especially considering the design of the treatment plan which the user participated with in a small degree. For users who are subject to compulsory psychiatric care health professionals meant that user interaction could be limited to the minimum. Health professionals believe that they have a good cooperation with relatives, but expresses at the same time that this work is challenging. The informants find it challenging when the users and health professionals have different views on what the clinical symptoms are. Some of them claimed that in some cases it would be correct to reality orientate the user.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Conclusion: It appears that there are several issues that seem to stand in contrast to both the health trust and the Board of Health guidelines. Meanwhile, these signals are ambiguous in that it also opens for discretion based coercion. The lack of willingness to give up power from health personel&amp;rsquo;s side puts a damper in the practice of user interaction.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mastergradsoppgave</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">erfaringsbaserte</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Valenti, Emanuele</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Banks, Ciara</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Calcedo-Barba, Alfredo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bensimon, Cécile</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hoffmann, Karin-Maria</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pelto-Piri, Veikko</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jurin, Tanja</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mendoza, Octavio</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mundt, Adrian</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rugkåsa, Jorun</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tubini, Jacopo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Priebe, Stefan</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Informal coercion in psychiatry: a focus group study of attitudes and experiences of mental health professionals in ten countries</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The International Journal for Research in Social and Genetic Epidemiology and Mental Health Services</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">50</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse, Tvangsmidler, Etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Toril B. Terkelsen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Inger Beate Larsen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The locked psychiatric ward: Hotel or detention camp for people with dual diagnosis</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Mental Health</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://informahealthcare.com/doi/full/10.3109/09638237.2013.799266</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">22</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tøgersen, K</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bjerke, E</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gjelstad, K</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ruud, T.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Psykiatriske tvangsinnleggelser i Østfold i 2000 og 2010</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://tidsskriftet.no/article/3275174</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Skorpen, F.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thorsen, A. A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Forsberg, C.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rehnsfeldt, A. W.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Suffering related to dignity among patients at a psychiatric hospital</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nurse Ethics</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24046222?dopt=Abstract</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">148-62</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Skorpen, F.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thorsen, A. A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Forsberg, C.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rehnsfeldt, A. W.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Suffering related to dignity among patients at a psychiatric hospital</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nursing Ethics</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dignity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">patient</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">psychiatric hospital</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Q-methodology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">suffering</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://nej.sagepub.com/content/21/2/148.full.pdf+html</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">148-62</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">0969-7330</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><auth-address><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; Stord/Haugesund University College, Norway.</style></auth-address><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Inger B Larsen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Toril B. Terkelsen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Coercion in a locked psychiatric ward: Perspectives of patients and staff</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nursing Ethics</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://nej.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/10/03/0969733013503601.abstract</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsbehandling, Tvangsmidler</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Arne Thorvik</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Noen ganger er det kanskje nødvendig. Om egenopplevelse av tvunget vern ved suicidalitet</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tidsskriftet Suicidologi</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.med.uio.no/klinmed/forskning/sentre/nssf/tidsskrift/2012/nr2/thorvik.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">17</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>36</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tande, Marina Liz</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Høgskolen i Hedmark</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvang som ressurs?</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://hdl.handle.net/11250/132180</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Studentoppgave</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsbehandling</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Toril Borch Terkelsen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Inger Beate Larsen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsmedisinering som permanent unntakstilstand. Erfaringer fra feltarbeid</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tidsskrift for psykisk helsearbeid</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/138752</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nr.2</style></number><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsbehandling</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Eirik Tanberg</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangshjelp etter pasientrettighetsloven kapittel 4A</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Juridiske Fakultet</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/123456789/19639</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Universitetet i Oslo</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DUO. Digitale utgivelser ved UIO</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>32</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Toril B. Terkelsen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Håndtering av engler og UFOer i psykiatrisk avdeling. En etnografisk studie av hvordan psykotiske uttrykk forstås og kontrolleres.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Institutt for samfunnsmedisin</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://bora.uib.no/bitstream/handle/1956/4587/19445.pdf?sequence=2</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Universitetet i Bergen</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsbehandling, Tvangsinnleggelse</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anine Terland</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Samme bruker - ulike lovbestemmelser - samme rettsikkerhet? Om bruk av tvang hjemlet i sosialtjenestelovens kapittel 4A og pasientrettighetslovens kapittel 4A</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Det medisinske fakultet. Helseledelse og helseøkonomi.</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/123456789/30198</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Universitetet i Oslo</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DUO. Digitale utgivelser ved UIO.</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Master</style></work-type><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">S. Heskestad</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">M. Tytlandsvik</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Brukerstyrte kriseinnleggelser ved alvorlig psykisk lidelse</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tidsskrift for den norske legeforening</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://tidsskriftet.no/article/1635859/</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></number><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Terje Tørrissen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelser i en akuttpsykiatrisk post</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://tidsskriftet.no/article/1568719</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tidsskrift for den Norske legeforening </style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsinnleggelse</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Siri Blesvik</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rigmor Diseth</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tonje Lossius Husum</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ragnfrid Kogstad</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hege Jeanette Orefellen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gro H. Thune</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Menneskerettigheter også for psykiatriske pasienter i Norge?</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://tidsskriftet.no/article/1390460</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Etikk</style></label></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Joar Tranøy</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">I sinnssykehusets vold: innlagtes motstand mot legemlig behandling ved Gaustad sykehus</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1993</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://bokelskere.no/bok/i-sinnssykehusets-vold/132529/</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pax</style></publisher><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9788253016023</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><label><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tvangsbehandling</style></label></record></records></xml>